Archive for the ‘Search Engine’ Category

All about search engines

15
Nov

Google’s latest major algorithm change, rolled out in Feb 2011, is called “Panda” and was big news for anyone doing internet market or SEO.  Many marketers reported huge SERP drops while a lesser number noticed gains.

Rumor has it that the Panda update came about from a focus group that Google held.  They had real humans evaluating actual websites and giving their opinions on different metrics.  The results of this group were then translated into a programming algorithm that was encorporated into the ranking calculation engine.

I’ve done a bunch of research and experiments on my own rankings since this update, as well as reading what guys a lot smarter than myself have published, and here’s what I’ve come up with:

Domain quality is now important again

In the “May Day” update prior to Panda, a chance was made that allowed individual pages to rank higher on their own merit, regardless of the trust value or strength of their domain.  It looks like with Panda that’s been reversed and now the collective value of ALL pages for a domain is taken into considering.  This is the main reason why EzineArticles rankings dropped and they’ve lost a lot of traffic.

What does this mean to me?
  • It’s no longer beneficial to add hundreds or thousands of low-quality content pages, as they’ve drag down the rankings of your entire domain
  • It’s better to build backlinks to your home page AND inner pages, rather than just your home page.  This tells Google that many of your pages have value and other sites “like” them.

Sites are evaluated monthly

Websites are evaluated every month.  If you make an on-site or off-site SEO change today, it’ll take about a month for Google to recognize it and adjust your rankings accordingly.

What does this mean to me?
  • If you’re experimenting with multiple link building services and techniques at the same time, it’s gonna be nearly impossible to know which ones helped and which ones hurt your rankings.  Also, it’s not productive to try a service for 1 week, assume it doesn’t work, and cancel your membership.  Then 3 weeks later you’ll just be surprised to see your rankings change and not attribute it to the service you had canceled.

Click-through rate is important

The number of people who click your site when it’s displayed in the SERP’s compared to clicking the other sites is now more important than ever.  The difficulty in this metric is that there’s no way for you to monitor the click-through rates, because Google doesn’t share enough data to do this.

What does this mean to me?
  • Make sure you META Description and Title are specific, relevant, and eye-catching.  Definitely don’t have any spelling mistakes, slang, profanity, etc.   You want your site to pop-out to the searcher amongst all the other results.

Bounce rate is important

It seems like the sites that had SERP improvements post Panda are ones that have low bounce rates – where visitors stay on the site for a long period of time and view many different pages.

This is sort of a no-brainer.  Why would Google respect sites that have shitty content, are annoying to look at, and offer no perceived value, which causes visitors to immediately leave?

What does this mean to me?
  • Have a well designed site that’s easy on the eyes.  If you don’t have design skills, don’t try to do it yourself. I’ve seen WAY too many sites that have black backgrounds with white text (terrible on the eyes), annoying animated gifs, terrible logos, etc.  I immediately think “rookie” and have a perceived notion that any content on the site is going to be amateurish.  Hire someone who knows what they’re doing.  Or if you’re intimidated by or unable to afford outsourcing, find a free professional-looking WordPress theme.
  • Have quality content, that’s unique and interesting.  Make it relevant to whatever topic your page or domain is about.
  • Offer visitor interaction, like commenting, voting, polls, surveys, contests, etc.
  • Keep your site fresh, either by allowing visitors/users to continually add content , or by adding it yourself or through a VA.

Repeat visitors are important

The Panda update is taking into account how many visitors return to your site.  Most people think that “unique” visitors are all that’s important, but Google has realized that if visitors are enjoying themselves on your site, they will return, which must be your site is valuable and of high quality.  This is also why Web 2.0 sites (compared to old-school static HTML sites or sites that offer no user interaction) are becoming more and more popular and continue to rank well in Google.

What does this mean to me?
  • Pretty much the same advice as above for keeping your bounce rate low applies to retaining repeat visitors.

Exact match domains have lost their value

In the past, if you bought a domain that matched exactly to your primary keyword, such as “cheap-ipods.com”, you were all-but guaranteed a Page 1 ranking with Google.  Well, post-Panda update that’s no longer the case.

It makes sense to me that the domain name shouldn’t have much effect on rankings, because why is it fair that the first person to get into a niche, who buys the .com, should be ranked higher than someone else who couldn’t get an exact-match domain but actually has a better site?

What does this mean to me?
  • Don’t worry too much about buying an exact match domain name, but I still think you should if it’s available.  Because I can’t imagine a scenario where Google will ever penalize an exact match domain, and other search engines still rank them higher.
Turns out, I’m actually a fan of the Panda update.  I think Google has made many good decisions in this latest algorithm update.  I could never understand why EzineArticles got so much traffic as most of the content was spun garbage.  I know people who were hit HARD by Panda, but they pretty much deserved it.  They were publishing garbage content and offered very little value for visitors.  Now they’ve had to wake up and reevaluate their marketing strategies.  Which is a good thing for the internet.

 

 

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

11
Jun

WebProNews recently posted this super interesting article about an experiment done by SEOMoz that looked at different Google ranking factors, and how many Search Engine Optimization experts view their importance.

http://www.webpronews.com/google-ranking-factors-2-2011-06

A few things that stuck out for me:

  • Page-level backlink metrics are the top algorithmic factor (compared to domain-level, link authority, social metrics, etc.)
  • Diversity of backlinks is greater than raw quantity
  • Nofollow backlinks do indeed help with rankings (further evidence to support this post)
  • Pages with more content rank better
  • Long titles and URLs are bad for SEO
  • Using keywords earlier in tags and content seems “wise”
  • Facebook may be more influential than Twitter for ranking, but Matt Cutts says Google can’t see Facebook shares so this doesn’t make sense to me
  • Google Buzz may be used for indexing (more info here)
  • Matt Cutts says in general the more content on the home page, the better, but you can also have too much

If you’re a nerd like me, hopefully you find this data useful too!

, , , , , , , , ,

09
May

I just saw a very interesting video post on SEOmoz:

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/correlation-data-for-seo-and-social-media-analysis-part-2-whiteboard-friday

One of the things we did when we saw no-follow links having a really high correlation was we went, well that’s just weird. Maybe what’s going on here is that no-follow links and followed links have a high correlation with each other, and in fact, they do. If you have lots of no-follow links, you tend to also have lots of followed links. So, that makes sense. All right maybe that’s all that’s causing it. But then there’s this one weird, weird data point – well, there’s several weird ones – but there’s this one weird data point around the percentage of followed links having a negative correlation, kind of a strong negative correlation with rankings, which sounds weird, but it suggests that websites and web pages that don’t have any no-follow links aren’t performing as well as those who have at least some or some reasonable percentage of them.

This paragraph caught my attention enormously, mostly because I’ve always been of the opinion that natural backlinking from a variety of sources is the best way to do off-page SEO.  I’ve always thought that a healthy mixture of noFollow and doFollow links were important, otherwise it’s pretty frickin’ easy for search engines to notice that you’re trying to “game” your rankings.  This is also why my automated social media service, SocialAdr uses a mixture of noFollow and doFollow social media sites.

Aaron @ SEOmoz sums it up well when he adds:

What I think that’s happening is that people who do natural things, normal websites, this is not normal. It is not normal to have a website that only has followed links. It’s almost like, man, you must be doing something funny because normal websites earn links from no-follows. They get linked to on Wikipedia, which is no-follow. They have blog comments that people leave and point to them. Those are no-follow. They have social media profiles. Almost all of those are no-follow. People tweet about them. Those are no-follow. There are all of these no-follow links that exist from sort of good places on the Web where you would naturally be mentioned if you’re a good website.

Thoughts?

, , , , , , , ,

25
Apr

A recent link building service I’ve tried and wholeheartedly recommend is One Hour Backlinks.  The dude who created Linklicious launched this creative site that makes it super simple and super quick to blast your sites with backlinks.  I’m a big fan not only of the ease-of-use of the site but its pleasing design.  It’s rare to find an internet marketing / SEO site that doesn’t look like it was designed using Geocities in 1997 ;)

Here’s what the order form looks like:

Like I said, super simple.

  1. Use the top slider to select how many backlinks you’d like (the more you want, the cheaper they get per link).
  2. Optionally choose radio buttons for “indexed links only”, “dofollow only”, or “PR1+”, keeping in mind that each option costs extra
  3. Enter your keywords
  4. Enter your URLs

Done!

Once you’ve placed an order and its been completed (mine took about 20 minutes), you can view the data on your “Complete Projects” page:

As you can see even though I paid for 2000 links I received 2420 of ‘em and the Indexation rate was 45%.

The “download links” hyperlink lets you download a CSV file that contains, for each link:

  • URL
  • PR
  • Indexed (yes, no)
  • DoFollow (yes, no)
  • Keyword
  • Target URL

This spreadsheet is super handy for loading into other link building systems to further boost the SEO-juice of your new One Hour Backlinks.

WINNING.

, , , , , , , ,

27
Jan

Occasionally I come across an SEO tool that I feel is worthy of blogging about, and oddly enough today I have two of ‘em.

Linklicious

Instead of wasting hours building RSS feeds and pinging the feeds hoping for crawls, Linklicious eliminates all of the guesswork by providing a guaranteed 100% crawl rate.   It comes with a WordPress plugin so every post is added to an RSS feed, auto-shortened, pinged, and tracked so you can see exactly when your links were spidered.

Linklicious is quite affordable too:  they have a free account and the most feature-packed paid account is only $54/mo.

Here’s a chart that shows the improved crawl late with and without using Linklicious:

Link Pushing

I was looking for a completely automated, hands-off service that combined multiple backlinking techniques.   So I headed over to the Warrior Forum and a quick search brought me to this WSO.

Here’s what the “Link Pushing” service offers:

  1. User enters their information; a 2 minute process.
  2. System grabs an article from a random article directory.
  3. System spins the article using The Best Spinner.
  4. System submits the articles to Web 2.0 Properties and Auto-Approve Article directories backlinking to the money site.
  5. System then submits to various Doc share sites splitting the backlinks randomly to the money site, the Web 2.0s and the Auto Approve articles.
  6. System then submits to microblog sites with links randomly split between the money site, the Web 2.0s and the Auto Approve Article sites.
  7. System then submits spun articles to non-auto approval article sites with backlinks to the Web 2.0s and the auto approved article sites.

I had a couple questions before signing up and was super impressed with how quickly and professionally Greg (one of the owners) responded to me.  Although this service is in its infancy, so far I really like how easy it is to use and it seems like these dudes have some great features planned in the next release.  I don’t have enough data on its effectiveness to improve SERPs yet but I’ll post an update when I do.

, , , , , , , , , ,

Copyright © 2009-2011 Internet Marketing Fun. All rights reserved.