<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fresh content versus quality backlinks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing news, reviews, tips, and tricks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://im-fun.com/?p=557#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Googles Matt Cutts said google will not show all backlinks ever.  And I would honestly say that BOTH fresh content and quality backlinks are equally important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googles Matt Cutts said google will not show all backlinks ever.  And I would honestly say that BOTH fresh content and quality backlinks are equally important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1q2w3e</title>
		<link>http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>1q2w3e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://im-fun.com/?p=557#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Good plan.  My vote is on fresh content (Site A).  I&#039;ve noticed that quite often doFollow high PR backlinks never show up on Google Webmaster Tools or Yahoo Site Explorer.  I have no idea why???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good plan.  My vote is on fresh content (Site A).  I&#8217;ve noticed that quite often doFollow high PR backlinks never show up on Google Webmaster Tools or Yahoo Site Explorer.  I have no idea why???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reba01231</title>
		<link>http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Reba01231</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://im-fun.com/?p=557#comment-117</guid>
		<description>I agree!  Although I&#039;m not sure if your test is ideal...like is it fair to only post 1 backlink per day on Site B?  And how many words will you be putting into your unique posts on Site A?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree!  Although I&#8217;m not sure if your test is ideal&#8230;like is it fair to only post 1 backlink per day on Site B?  And how many words will you be putting into your unique posts on Site A?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedster</title>
		<link>http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://im-fun.com/?p=557#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Hay Kane!  I think this is a great idea.  I&#039;ve wondered the same thing myself.  Keep us posted, yo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay Kane!  I think this is a great idea.  I&#8217;ve wondered the same thing myself.  Keep us posted, yo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
