<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Marketing Fun &#187; Experiments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://im-fun.com/category/experiments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://im-fun.com</link>
	<description>Internet marketing news, reviews, tips, and tricks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Content vs Backlinks &#8211; Having trouble getting indexed!</title>
		<link>http://im-fun.com/experiments/content-vs-backlinks-having-trouble-getting-indexed/615/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=content-vs-backlinks-having-trouble-getting-indexed</link>
		<comments>http://im-fun.com/experiments/content-vs-backlinks-having-trouble-getting-indexed/615/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content vs backlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indexing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://im-fun.com/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note: This post is related to my ongoing experiment to determine which Google prefers more &#8211; Fresh Content or Quality Backlinks Ok just an update - About 2 days after I tried to get both sites indexed by Google (used StumbleUpon, submitted sitemaps to Google Webmaster Tools, posted a couple backlinks on high PR sites)&#8230;site [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Note:</span></strong> This post is related to <strong>my ongoing experiment</strong> to determine which <strong>Google </strong>prefers <span style="text-decoration: underline;">more</span> &#8211; <strong><a href="http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/">Fresh Content or Quality Backlinks</a></strong></p></blockquote>
<hr />
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://im-fun.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/jumphigherexercises-header.png" rel="thumbnail"><img class="size-medium wp-image-596 aligncenter" title="jumphigherexercises-header" src="http://im-fun.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/jumphigherexercises-header-300x56.jpg" alt="jumphigherexercises-header" width="300" height="56" /></a></span></p>
<p>Ok just an update -</p>
<p>About 2 days after I tried to get both sites indexed by Google (used StumbleUpon, submitted sitemaps to Google Webmaster Tools, posted a couple backlinks on high PR sites)&#8230;site &#8220;b&#8221; was but site &#8220;a&#8221; still wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Now here we are a few weeks later and site &#8220;a&#8221; is indexed but site &#8220;b&#8221; isn&#8217;t. So it seems as if Google knows that they are similar in structure and content (although I tried my best to rewrite the content using synonyms and what-not so it was unique) and randomly decides to switch which one is indexed? Does anyone else find that frickin&#8217; weird! <img title="Confused" src="http://www.warriorforum.com/images/smilies/confused.gif" border="0" alt="" /></p>
<p>My assumption is that this is happening because they&#8217;re both subdomains of the same domain, so perhaps my experiment was flawed before I ever started. Maybe I should have purchased two unique domains instead of cheaping out?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Here&#8217;s the two queries to see which pages from each site are indexed:</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="margin-bottom: 3px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;num=100&amp;q=site%3Ajump-higher-exercises-a.be-better.net&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=" target="_blank">Site A index query</a></li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 3px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;num=100&amp;q=site%3Ajump-higher-exercises-b.be-better.net&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=" target="_blank">Site B index query</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://im-fun.com/experiments/content-vs-backlinks-having-trouble-getting-indexed/615/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Content vs Backlinks &#8211; Both sites are live!</title>
		<link>http://im-fun.com/experiments/content-vs-backlinks-both-sites-are-live/593/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=content-vs-backlinks-both-sites-are-live</link>
		<comments>http://im-fun.com/experiments/content-vs-backlinks-both-sites-are-live/593/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content vs backlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social bookmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stumbleupon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://im-fun.com/?p=593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note: This post is related to my ongoing experiment to determine which Google prefers more &#8211; Fresh Content or Quality Backlinks So since my last post I&#8217;ve done the following: Created two subdomains: A &#8211; Jump Higher Exercises B &#8211; Jump Higher Exercises Did a WordPress install into A, with SEO optimized plugins Threw together [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Note:</span></strong> This post is related to <strong>my ongoing experiment</strong> to determine which <strong>Google </strong>prefers <span style="text-decoration: underline;">more</span> &#8211; <strong><a href="http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/">Fresh Content or Quality Backlinks</a></strong></p></blockquote>
<hr />
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://im-fun.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/jumphigherexercises-header.png" rel="thumbnail"><img class="size-medium wp-image-596 aligncenter" title="jumphigherexercises-header" src="http://im-fun.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/jumphigherexercises-header-300x56.jpg" alt="jumphigherexercises-header" width="300" height="56" /></a></span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">So since my last post I&#8217;ve done the following:</span></p>
<ol>
<li>Created two subdomains:
<ul>
<li style="margin-bottom: 3px;">A &#8211; <a href="http://jump-higher-exercises-a.be-better.net/" rel="external nofollow">Jump Higher Exercises</a></li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 3px;">B &#8211; <a href="http://jump-higher-exercises-b.be-better.net/" rel="external nofollow">Jump Higher Exercises</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Did a WordPress install into A, with SEO optimized plugins</li>
<li>Threw together a logo real quick</li>
<li>Worked on <strong>content</strong>; just enough posts to make the site <em>somewhat </em>worth visiting</li>
<li>Cloned the database and web server files from A to B</li>
<li>Unique-ified the content for B</li>
</ol>
<p>Now I&#8217;m going to <strong>Stumble </strong>both sites and maybe submit them to a couple other <strong>social bookmarking services</strong>.  Just so that they&#8217;ll be indexed quicker.</p>
<p>I am concerned though that although the content is unique <strong>Google </strong>may reject one of them because the overall structure is identical.</p>
<p>Guess we&#8217;ll have to wait and see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://im-fun.com/experiments/content-vs-backlinks-both-sites-are-live/593/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Content vs Backlinks &#8211; Found a Niche Topic!</title>
		<link>http://im-fun.com/experiments/content-vs-backlinks-found-a-niche-topic/566/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=content-vs-backlinks-found-a-niche-topic</link>
		<comments>http://im-fun.com/experiments/content-vs-backlinks-found-a-niche-topic/566/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clickbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content vs backlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jump higher exercies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro niche finder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://im-fun.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note: This post is related to my ongoing experiment to determine which Google prefers more &#8211; Fresh Content or Quality Backlinks Well after a quick browse through ClickBank I stumbled across this -&#62; Double Your Vertical Leap. The World&#8217;s Top Selling Vertical Jump Enhancement System Is Back, Better Than Ever. 6 Months Of Extensive Testing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Note:</span></strong> This post is related to <strong>my ongoing experiment</strong> to determine which <strong>Google </strong>prefers <span style="text-decoration: underline;">more</span> &#8211; <strong><a href="http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/">Fresh Content or Quality Backlinks</a></strong></p></blockquote>
<hr />
<p>Well after a quick browse through <strong><a href="http://im-fun.com/go/ClickBankSearch01">ClickBank</a> </strong>I stumbled across this -&gt; <a href="http://im-fun.com/go/DoubleVerticalLeap"><strong>Double Your Vertical Leap</strong></a>.<br />
<center><br />
<a href="http://im-fun.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/clickbank-verticaljump.png" rel="thumbnail"><img src="http://im-fun.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/clickbank-verticaljump-300x113.png" alt="clickbank-verticaljump" title="clickbank-verticaljump" width="300" height="113" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-586" /></a><br />
</center></p>
<blockquote><p>The World&#8217;s Top Selling Vertical Jump Enhancement System Is Back, Better Than Ever. 6 Months Of Extensive Testing &#8211; And A Mouth-watering Offer &#8211; Has Produced A Website That Converts At 5-7%&#8230; Every Single Time! Look For More Updates Shortly&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s got some decent numbers:</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">$89 / <strong>sale</strong></li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">51% <strong>commission</strong></li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">93% <strong>referred</strong></li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">12.05 <strong>gravity</strong></li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">And a 5-7% <strong>conversion rate </strong>on the pitch page</li>
</ul>
<p>After searching for &#8220;vertical jump&#8221; in good &#8216;ol <a href="http://im-fun.com/go/MicroNicheFinder"><strong>Micro Niche Finder</strong></a>, I came across a particular phrase that had <em>solid results</em>.</p>
<h4 style="text-align: center;">&#8220;jump higher exercises&#8221;</h4>
<ul>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;"><strong>Search Count</strong> = 1,300 (how many times per month people are searching on Google for this phrase &#8211; this is a tad low but not terrible)</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;"><strong>Exact Phrase Count</strong> = 13,200 (how many total results there are for this phrase <em>in quotes</em> &#8211; under 20,000 is good)</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;"><strong>Commercial Intent</strong> = 29% (how likely a person searching for this phrase is to BUY something &#8211; this is <em>bad</em> but I&#8217;m not doing this to make money)</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;"><strong>Strength of Competition</strong> = 14 (this is <em>excellent</em>, it means the competing sites don&#8217;t have very good backlinks)</li>
</ul>
<p>So I&#8217;m all set!  The next steps are to create two subdomains, setup WordPress, and then work on the initial content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://im-fun.com/experiments/content-vs-backlinks-found-a-niche-topic/566/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fresh content versus quality backlinks</title>
		<link>http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks</link>
		<comments>http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content vs backlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indexing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subdomain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://im-fun.com/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately I&#8217;ve been wondering what Google favors more &#8211; fresh, unique content or quality (PR 4 or higher) backlinks. There&#8217;s oceans of people that are on either side of the argument.  Some say it&#8217;s best to have lots of one-way backlinks from respected, authority sites.  Others say it&#8217;s best to be constantly adding new, unique [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-559" title="question_mark" src="http://im-fun.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/question_mark.jpg" alt="question_mark" width="100" height="100" />Lately I&#8217;ve been wondering what <strong>Google</strong> favors more &#8211; <span style="color: #008000;">fresh, unique content</span> or <span style="color: #ff0000;">quality (PR 4 or higher) backlinks</span>.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s oceans of people that are on either side of the argument.  Some say it&#8217;s best to have lots of one-way backlinks from respected, <em>authority</em> sites.  Others say it&#8217;s best to be constantly adding new, unique content.</p>
<p>Personally I think both are useful in their own way.  But the nerd inside of me wants to figure out the &#8220;magic formula&#8221;.  Should I spend 50% of my time on each, or 80% on content and 20% on backlinks?  It&#8217;s quite the quandary.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;ve decided to perform a test.  The parameters and execution of the test won&#8217;t be perfect, as there&#8217;s only one of me and I&#8217;m not a robot.  But nevertheless, I&#8217;m hoping it can provide some useful insight into this problem.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Here&#8217;s what I aim to do:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Site A (CONTENT)<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">Niche topic to be determined</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">A subdomain of an existing generically-named domain that I own (primary keyword subdomain name, with &#8220;A&#8221; on the end)</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">WordPress template with all SEO-related plugins activated</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">Initial content will be 2 or 3 posts, keyword-rich, appropriately tagged</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">After indexed by Google, I&#8217;ll add <strong>one new article a day for a month</strong></li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">Each article will use the keywords that I&#8217;m targeting</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Site B (BACKLINKS)</strong>
<ul>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">Same subdomain setup as Site A, but with &#8220;B&#8221; on the end</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">Same WordPress setup</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">Same initial content, but each post rewritten to be unique</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">After indexed by Google, I&#8217;ll add <strong>one high-PR backlink a day for a month</strong></li>
<li style="margin-bottom:3px;">No new posts</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Sounds like fun, eh?   Does anyone have a prediction on which site will rank higher with <strong>Google </strong>at the end of the month?</p>
<hr />
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.</p>
<hr />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://im-fun.com/search-engine/optimization/fresh-content-versus-quality-backlinks/557/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

